Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
16th October 2017, 15:56 | #26544 | Link |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,973
|
I'm looking at it. But with the amount of work involved, it may require a "Pro" version so I can recover costs. Donations have pretty much vanished in the last couple years (explaining the long times between versions). Even if I did a Pro version, though, I'd grandfather anyone who had already donated for BD-RB or DVD-RB or had substantially contributed through bug reports.
I think the most useful function would be importing 4K video and authoring it into a UHD BD. No promises though, as I've just started researching it. Last edited by jdobbs; 16th October 2017 at 16:08. |
16th October 2017, 16:05 | #26545 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 232
|
Hi guys thereīs some application so Iīll can do a full surface disc scan? searching for errors? bad sectors etc? That application can show a map of the surface and sectors? or when I use IMGburn to pass some disc to hard drive if I donīt get any errors that means the disc is good?
Thank you in advance |
16th October 2017, 16:26 | #26547 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,129
|
Quote:
In other words, the engine under the hood of a UHD disk is a little different than the engine under the hood of a Blu-ray disk. |
|
16th October 2017, 18:44 | #26549 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 61
|
Quote:
Thanks for taking a look at this! |
|
17th October 2017, 00:32 | #26550 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 225
|
Quote:
|
|
17th October 2017, 02:36 | #26551 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,100
|
Quote:
You should provide an up front purchase for those who want that, and you should also provide (my preference) a monthly subscription. The reason being is that if people want to use this excellent and now essential program, they need to cough up the monthly $5.99 or whatever. That ASSURES you a regular income; that is the only one that does in my lowly and wretched opinion. That way, all the nice people here who use it, say 100 people hopefully, then you have a regular, recurring income of $600/month. A no-brainer to me... |
|
17th October 2017, 03:24 | #26552 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Within the main Source.
Posts: 895
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Life is not a journey to the grave; but rather to skid out broadside, thoroughly used, torn and warn and loudly proclaim; WOW; What a ride!!! Soon, I'm going to do it AGAiN in different skin!! Last edited by AmigaFuture; 17th October 2017 at 03:35. |
||
17th October 2017, 09:20 | #26557 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
|
|
17th October 2017, 09:22 | #26558 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 67
|
Originally Posted by staina View Post
Application x264L - 64.exe me in different parts processing falls, see error dump from window below... Quote:
A little I'm searched and to internet found same version codec X264, but with other size see. link. http://www.digital-digest.com/softwa...story.html#471 This codec at processing not once no srasch. It is possible codecs version 2665 compare and give here know in what are other and whether it is possible use and me found codec without reduction in quality output videos? Yet I'm found out that the at option "Use DirectshowSource frame serving" at two pass uses latest version codec X264 (file X264.exe) how for frame serving so and for encoding, but at options "Use X264s internal LAVF for frame serving" uses older versuses older version codec X264 (file X264L - 64.exe) how for frame serving so and for encoding. Which option is then for quality better? |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|