Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Video Encoding > MPEG-4 ASP
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 25th January 2007, 08:27   #321  |  Link
Sharro
Xvid Tribalistic Fan
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Portugal
Posts: 270
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeadBangeR77 View Post
OT:

...
2) I've tried Colormatrix and I'm not happy with its results, with all the respect to the creator. First, it oversaturates red and human faces, imo. Second, it is forcing tv-scale (not full colors' range) by default, what I don't like especially (washed-out colors, dimmed image). Just a few ideas
If I well understood the principle of Colormatrix and if used properly it shouldn't give you the above problems, it should just feed the encoder with the colormatrix he's expecting (601) against the (mainly) standard colormatrix of mpeg2 (BT709).

I've compared colors of the mpeg2source and avisource with converttorgb and definetly the encodes with colormatrix had better color matching.

Maybe it could be a mistake of my eyes.

All the best,

Sharro
Sharro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2007, 23:36   #322  |  Link
Beave
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 205
If the source is not bt709 you will get wrong colors with colormatrix of course.
I actually noticed the wrong colors myself a few years back and happiliy found colormatrix what got the solution to this problem. That was before autogk or megui were using them as standard.
Beave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th April 2008, 23:02   #323  |  Link
Vindarath
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 26
is there any 'all purpose cqm'? im encoding hitman with the high rate cqm at cq2, 704w400h. but im getting bitrates below 1600.
Vindarath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2008, 02:10   #324  |  Link
Ranguvar
Registered User
 
Ranguvar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ::1
Posts: 1,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vindarath View Post
is there any 'all purpose cqm'? im encoding hitman with the high rate cqm at cq2, 704w400h. but im getting bitrates below 1600.
Try encoding a sample EQM V3LR, MPEG, and possibly EQM V3HR, and see which looks better to you.
Ranguvar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2008, 17:38   #325  |  Link
Lenny_Nero
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: London, south of the river
Posts: 64
Quote:
is there any 'all purpose cqm'?
I have been thinking about this question since it was posted, and because I do a large amount of DVB-TV to xvid encodes (5~10 a day) I have been looking for the best all-rounder to save me re-encoding things over and over.

Well just as there is no 'best' there is not really a cqm that will work right with everything, for everybody, because what I think looks good others will not.

But so far I have found that, again, this is for me (I like a sharper picture and always used mpeg over H.263) I have been very impressed with the "EQM - AutoGK sharp.xcm" cqm and so far (over 100 encodes) its working right every time and has yet to have a problem with any SAP (nothing below 16 in the inter-matrix).

But I would also do as Ranguvar says and at least try "EQM V3LR, MPEG, and possibly EQM V3HR" as well because they are top quality cqm's.
Attached Images
 
__________________
EncodingBox DFI-LP RDX200 CF-DR AMD4200x2 @2.5GHz 2GB G.Skill HZ's x1650XT Corsair HX620 Eclipse62
LG GSA-H42N Lite0n SHM-165P6S Asus CRW-5232A Optiarc AD-5170A Sony e500's & Ducky 1087 via KVM
Lenny_Nero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2008, 17:45   #326  |  Link
Ranguvar
Registered User
 
Ranguvar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ::1
Posts: 1,236
The all-purpose CQM is now Xivd with the VAQ patch, using H.263 (technically not a CQM) with Adaptive Quantization enabled
Ranguvar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2008, 23:31   #327  |  Link
shae
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 397
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranguvar View Post
The all-purpose CQM is now Xivd with the VAQ patch, using H.263 (technically not a CQM) with Adaptive Quantization enabled
Wouldn't that still result in a soft image?
shae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th August 2008, 05:41   #328  |  Link
Ranguvar
Registered User
 
Ranguvar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ::1
Posts: 1,236
In most situations, nope. Perhaps in extremes.
Ranguvar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th August 2008, 13:59   #329  |  Link
Lenny_Nero
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: London, south of the river
Posts: 64
Quote:
Wouldn't that still result in a soft image?
Thats how I would have thought it, or are you saying that now with the VAQ patch you dont need to do anything with CQM/QM's ?
__________________
EncodingBox DFI-LP RDX200 CF-DR AMD4200x2 @2.5GHz 2GB G.Skill HZ's x1650XT Corsair HX620 Eclipse62
LG GSA-H42N Lite0n SHM-165P6S Asus CRW-5232A Optiarc AD-5170A Sony e500's & Ducky 1087 via KVM
Lenny_Nero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th August 2008, 14:09   #330  |  Link
Sharktooth
Mr. Sandman
 
Sharktooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Haddonfield, IL
Posts: 11,768
consider VAQ as a sort of "adaprive CQM" that even works on standalones.
If i have to choose between encoding with a CQM or encoding with VAQ, ill go for VAQ first. If and only if im not satisfied then i would use a CQM.
Sharktooth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2008, 12:30   #331  |  Link
Video Master
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharktooth View Post
consider VAQ as a sort of "adaprive CQM" that even works on standalones.
If i have to choose between encoding with a CQM or encoding with VAQ, ill go for VAQ first. If and only if im not satisfied then i would use a CQM.
I too prefer H.263 + AQ over CQMs , they work best for me.

Also i am using Xvid 1.1.2 [xvidcore.dll] Koepis Vanilla CVS Build , Nov 1 2006 specifically.
__________________
Knowledge is the Greatest Power.
Share It.
Let others also feel it.

- ViDeO MaStEr
Video Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2008, 13:35   #332  |  Link
Sharktooth
Mr. Sandman
 
Sharktooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Haddonfield, IL
Posts: 11,768
xvid 1.1.2 AQ is not VAQ... and it sux...
Sharktooth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2008, 14:58   #333  |  Link
Video Master
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharktooth View Post
xvid 1.1.2 AQ is not VAQ... and it sux...
Point noted
__________________
Knowledge is the Greatest Power.
Share It.
Let others also feel it.

- ViDeO MaStEr
Video Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th February 2010, 21:23   #334  |  Link
Tuik
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 85
Hello,

What Custom Matrix should I use in SD content with a 2pass bitrate of 2250 kbps? The aim is the best sharpeness possible.

Thank you for the help.
Tuik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2010, 17:54   #335  |  Link
Jawor
Ex-ter-mi-nate!
 
Jawor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: www.videoaudio.pl
Posts: 218
EQM v3 HR preserves detail pretty well (and works OK with VAQ). Qpel can help a lot as well (if our target player supports it). It's the resizing from 1920x1080 to 720xXXX that will cause a significant loss of detail (of course we have no other choice if we want to play our encodes on “DivX Home Theater” certified players).
__________________
Please excuse if my English is crappy.

Archive of my Xvid builds

http://www.videoaudio.pl
Jawor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2010, 22:43   #336  |  Link
elguaxo
Registered User
 
elguaxo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 260
Read the sticky

Here you have a thread with compressibility tests using different CQMs and Jawor made a useful comment on compatibility here.

The higher bitrate matrices keep more details, but they also need more bitrate.


edit: lol, the post with the question I was commenting to disappeared.

Last edited by elguaxo; 31st July 2010 at 11:44.
elguaxo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2010, 23:10   #337  |  Link
Jawor
Ex-ter-mi-nate!
 
Jawor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: www.videoaudio.pl
Posts: 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by elguaxo View Post
Here you have a thread with compressibility tests using different CQMs and Jawor made a useful comment on compatibility here.
About the min=16 requirement for the INTER part... If you change the 15s to 16s in “EQM v3 HR”, the quality difference won't be really noticeable (I tried this ). MediaTek-based players may require such a change. My Philips DVP3142/12 (Zoran Vaddis 966 chipset) plays every custom matrix I can throw at it. Very old players (e.g. based on the ESS Vibratto chipset) probably won't play any of the “MPEG-Custom” matrices.
__________________
Please excuse if my English is crappy.

Archive of my Xvid builds

http://www.videoaudio.pl
Jawor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2010, 15:37   #338  |  Link
Tuik
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jawor View Post
EQM v3 HR preserves detail pretty well (and works OK with VAQ). Qpel can help a lot as well (if our target player supports it). It's the resizing from 1920x1080 to 720xXXX that will cause a significant loss of detail (of course we have no other choice if we want to play our encodes on “DivX Home Theater” certified players).

It's ok to use a custom matrix and VAQ at the same time? And how do i use VAQ in xvid_encraw?
Tuik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2010, 01:13   #339  |  Link
Sharktooth
Mr. Sandman
 
Sharktooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Haddonfield, IL
Posts: 11,768
not all quant matrices are VAQ friendly.
test them on a short clip and see if they're behaving correctly.
Sharktooth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2010, 14:17   #340  |  Link
henryho_hk
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 889
Copy an updated xvidcore.dll to the same folder as xvid_encraw. Then you can use the lumi-masking option to turn on VAQ.
henryho_hk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:48.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.