Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
15th December 2016, 05:07 | #41502 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,229
|
Quote:
With my R9-280X it worked, when I first got the RX480 it didn't (possibly requiring a cold restart of the computer), but now with 16.12.1 it works again. |
|
15th December 2016, 09:36 | #41503 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 181
|
I do not find a good setup to see old remastered movies 2k to 4k. They are very noisy. Can somebody help me?
I'm using the latest version of madvr with this configuration: luma: very high chroma: let madvr decide upscaling/downscaling: let madvr decide. Without any upscaling refinement I would appreciate any help. Thks
__________________
"To infinity, and beyond!" Last edited by Oguignant; 15th December 2016 at 09:42. |
15th December 2016, 10:09 | #41504 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 4,406
|
For old movies I suggest:
NNEDI3 128 luma: doubling: 128 neurons, quadrupling: 32 neurons chroma: let madVR decide upscaling/downscaling: let madvr decide NNEDI3 is great for older video content while NGU is great for native HD content.
__________________
madVR options explained |
15th December 2016, 11:05 | #41505 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 41
|
Hi,
When looking at HDR (10 bits, HEVC) video on MadVr(Jriver), I get a black screen. My display is full 4k / HDR / HDCP 2.2 compliant and my graphic card too (Nvidia GTX1070). Is there any recommanded settings or user guide (MadVr/Nvidia control pannel) for watching a HDR video on my HTPC ? Thx |
15th December 2016, 11:11 | #41506 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 181
|
Quote:
Thks
__________________
"To infinity, and beyond!" |
|
15th December 2016, 11:18 | #41507 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 181
|
Quote:
Update I tried it. It looks a little better. But the render time is high. 40ms. Is a remux file of 30 gb with bit rate 41.6mb/s. I use gtx 1080 g1 oc.
__________________
"To infinity, and beyond!" Last edited by Oguignant; 15th December 2016 at 11:29. |
|
15th December 2016, 11:56 | #41508 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 4,406
|
Quote:
I meant NNEDI3 128 for luma doubling to 4K, but of course that depends on which GPU you have. NNEDI3 128 runs at about the same speed as NGU veryHigh for me so I hoped you could run it as well. I can run NNEDI3 256 for 1080p24 -> 2160 so I might be overestimating what is possible.
__________________
madVR options explained |
|
15th December 2016, 12:28 | #41509 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 181
|
Quote:
Chroma upscaling nnedi3 32 Image upscaling NNEDI3 doubling 256 quadrupling 32 Render time 58 ms Others option let madvr decide Chroma upscaling nnedi3 32 Image upscaling NNEDI3 doubling 128 quadrupling 32 Render time 40 ms Others option let madvr decide Chroma upscaling nnedi3 32 Image upscaling NNEDI3 doubling 64 quadrupling 32 Render time 24 ms Others option let madvr decide Chroma upscaling NGU high Image upscaling NGU high Render time 19 ms Others option let madvr decide Chroma upscaling NGU high Image upscaling NGU very high Render time 40 ms Others option let madvr decide Render times are very bad. I do not understand why. This gpu is the fastest I found.
__________________
"To infinity, and beyond!" Last edited by Oguignant; 15th December 2016 at 13:01. |
|
15th December 2016, 12:41 | #41510 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,646
|
Fired up the 30th anniversary of Transformers the Movie tonight (It looks amazing) and I'm quite happy with super-xbr 150 AR
being used for chroma upscaling for this type of content. There's a number of scenes like this and they all show similar benefit. NGU doesn't do too good here, thinning lines and being softer than super-xbr 150 AR (even NGU very high SR4!) Where as super-xbr 150 is keeping the same line thickness but giving it some nice line darkening. Can post more scenes if anyone would like to see them. Check it out. Last edited by ryrynz; 15th December 2016 at 12:43. |
15th December 2016, 12:57 | #41511 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 137
|
I'm interested to see more screenshots. It's a great example to show that chroma does count.
Could you post screenshots of this scene with Jinc or NNEDI3 32/64 neurons just to see the results? I didn't expect that super-xbr was so good actually, I aslo find it better than NGU very high in this example.
__________________
Windows 8.1 and 10 x64 - Intel Core i5-4670K (4.2 GHz) - 8 GB DDR3 - MSI Geforce GTX 1080 8 GB - Sony KD-55A1 - Denon AVR-X3600H |
15th December 2016, 13:46 | #41512 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,646
|
Quote:
As you'd expect based on what I've said previously NNEDI3 32 neurons and 64 neurons are almost identical, 64 is a waste of resources IMO :P I think NNEDI3 has the edge here but it's slight. Jinc AR vs NNEDI3 64 neurons. NNEDI3 32 neurons vs NNEDI3 64 neurons. |
|
15th December 2016, 14:22 | #41513 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 58
|
Quote:
And they also performs different in motion. Static screenshots and the image you get when the movie is running is not the same. Plasma tvs for example has much higher motion resolution than lcds or oleds and so they will show a sharper image. You are not maximizing madvrs upscaling algorithms on an LCD or OLED lol 300 lines is sub DVD resolution in motion. Plasma tvs can show all 1080 lines from Blu Ray content Last edited by Patrik G; 15th December 2016 at 14:28. |
|
15th December 2016, 14:22 | #41514 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 137
|
Quote:
Super-xbr 150 is the sharpest between all these options but I find that Jinc is still a great performer when you consider that it doesn't need much resources. NGU low could be a great deal too. Quote:
__________________
Windows 8.1 and 10 x64 - Intel Core i5-4670K (4.2 GHz) - 8 GB DDR3 - MSI Geforce GTX 1080 8 GB - Sony KD-55A1 - Denon AVR-X3600H Last edited by Werewolfy; 15th December 2016 at 14:27. |
|
15th December 2016, 15:21 | #41515 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 25
|
In the screens by Neo-XP I actually think BilateralSharp looks best. Compare the red on the neck. All other algorithms seem to bleed the red into the surrounding skin colour. I'd be interested in how reconstruction soft performed in that image.
|
15th December 2016, 19:59 | #41516 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 4,406
|
Those look fine actually, I was hoping NNEDI3 128 would be faster for you but that isn't too far off. I have a Titan X (Pascal), OC 2050 MHz.
__________________
madVR options explained |
15th December 2016, 22:43 | #41520 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 181
|
Quote:
Gtx 1080 + madvr with new movies, like guardians of the galaxy, NGU It does very well. The colors and details look great on my tv oled 4k tv... Chroma upscaling NGU high Image upscaling luma + chroma NGU very high Crop black bars Upscaling refinement enhance detail 1.5 Others option let madvr decide Render time 26 ms
__________________
"To infinity, and beyond!" Last edited by Oguignant; 15th December 2016 at 23:13. |
|
Tags |
direct compute, dithering, error diffusion, madvr, ngu, nnedi3, quality, renderer, scaling, uhd upscaling, upsampling |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|