Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
31st January 2014, 22:59 | #19043 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA, Oregon
Posts: 791
|
Quote:
Nice JD lol.
__________________
Only one rooster, need be in the hen house... |
|
31st January 2014, 23:13 | #19045 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: North Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 112
|
Mr
Have tried using the 3D capabilities to:
a) do a full backup of a 3DBD to BD25, and b) do a movie-only backup of a 3DBD to BD25. However, I always get a "Failed video encode, aborted" result. Are these capabilities supported or am I misunderstanding the new features? INF file: Code:
[Status] LABEL=I_ROBOT VERSION=v0.46.07 (beta) SOURCE_SIZE=35033303040 SOURCE_VIDEO_SIZE=35033303040 TARGET_SIZE=24641536000 REDUCTION=.703374613917078 RESIZE_1080=0 RESIZE_1440=0 AUDIO_TO_KEEP=eng; KEEP_HD_AUDIO=-1 SUBS_TO_KEEP=eng; BACKUP_MODE=1 MOVIEONLY_TYPE=0 USE_LAVF=0 INSTANCES=4 DGDECNV=0 SSIF_MODE=-1 QUICK=0 ENCODE_STEP=1.5 [00800] AUDIO=10000 PGS=1000000000 VIDEO2=0 V2MBRATE=0 M2TS_TARGET=24641536000 RATE=21678 Code:
[01/31/14] BD Rebuilder v0.46.07 (beta) [13:56:57] Source: I_ROBOT_00800 - Input BD size: 32.63 GB - Approximate total content: [01:54:44.877] - Target BD size: 22.95 GB - Windows Version: 6.1 [7601] - MOVIE-ONLY mode enabled - Quality: Highest (Very Slow), ABR - MVC 3D Output Mode enabled - Decoding/Frame serving: FRIMDecode - Audio Settings: AC3=0 DTS=0 HD=1 Kbs=448 - Resuming from previously started job. [13:57:00] PHASE ONE, Encoding - [13:57:00] Processing: VID_00800 (1 of 1) - [13:57:01] Reencoding video [VID_00800] - Source Video: MPEG-4 (AVC), 1920x1080 - Rate/Length: 23.976fps, 165,072 frames - Bitrate: 21,678 Kbs - Using FRIMEncoder for MVC reencoding - [13:57:01] Reencoding: VID_00800, Pass 1 of 1 [13:57:01] - Failed video encode, aborted |
31st January 2014, 23:25 | #19046 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA, Oregon
Posts: 791
|
Quote:
http://forum.doom9.org/showpost.php?p=1665312&postcount=19037
__________________
Only one rooster, need be in the hen house... |
|
31st January 2014, 23:37 | #19049 | Link | |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,973
|
Quote:
Last edited by jdobbs; 31st January 2014 at 23:39. |
|
31st January 2014, 23:44 | #19052 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: North Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 112
|
Mr
Quote:
Code:
"D:\Utilities\BD_Rebuilder\tools\FRIMDecode.exe" -i::mvc "F:\BD_REBUILDER WORKFILES\WORKFILES\00800.track_4113.264" "F:\BD_REBUILDER WORKFILES\WORKFILES\00800.track_4114.mvc" -o \\.\pipe\bdrb.yuv | "D:\Utilities\BD_Rebuilder\tools\FRIMEncode.exe" mvc -i \\.\pipe\bdrb_L.yuv -i \\.\pipe\bdrb_R.yuv -viewoutput -o "F:\BD_REBUILDER WORKFILES\WORKFILES\VID_00800.AVS.264" -o "F:\BD_REBUILDER WORKFILES\WORKFILES\VID_00800.AVS.mvc" -w 1920 -h 1080 -f 23.976 -u 3 -cpbsize 3750 -l 6 -profile high -level 4.1 -vbr 21678 45000 -gop 24 4 0 S -maxdpb 4 Last edited by jdobbs; 31st January 2014 at 23:53. |
|
1st February 2014, 00:04 | #19054 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: North Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 112
|
Mr
Quote:
ERROR: invalid video parameters (-15), src\pipeline_encode.cpp (961) ERROR: undefined behavior (-16), src\pipeline_decode.cpp (1113) ERROR: the previous asynchrous operation is in execution (1), src\main_frim_decode.cpp (129) Update: I have an I7/3770k @ 3.5GHz (not overclocked). Last edited by dfsooner; 1st February 2014 at 01:06. |
|
1st February 2014, 00:05 | #19055 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,059
|
Quote:
Few days back I encoded with frim by having avc on one drive and mvc on another and finally destination was on separate drive. When quality is set u 3 I could see around 70% usage and 60 - 65% on u 2. If u1 was chosen manually then 50 % was more like it on hexa core.
__________________
If you fail to plan; you plan to fail, would you not agree? Think about it. Last edited by HWK; 1st February 2014 at 00:11. |
|
1st February 2014, 00:08 | #19056 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA, Oregon
Posts: 791
|
At the rate it's going, I would doubt hard drive I/O(R/W) is the problem. Better latency by using multi drive I'm sure, but trivial gain I would think. probably varies across CPU's. I'm running a 1090t. Perhaps intel processors are hit harder?
__________________
Only one rooster, need be in the hen house... |
1st February 2014, 00:15 | #19057 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,059
|
Jdobbs and you have AMD and I own Intel processor. I am wondering if it has to do something with speed. I wouldn't be surprised if it is optimized for Intel processor, thus name Intel Media SDK.
__________________
If you fail to plan; you plan to fail, would you not agree? Think about it. |
1st February 2014, 00:19 | #19058 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,059
|
Quote:
If file is 10 GB long and another is 5 GB then on sector level it has to go back and forth to read. However I won't conclude this to be cause until more test are done. I am only saying because I loose few frames performance as well when doing this.
__________________
If you fail to plan; you plan to fail, would you not agree? Think about it. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|