Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
17th December 2008, 14:02 | #1 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 189
|
AACS support in libbluray
Quote:
You can take a look at dumpHD as a sample implementation. KenD00 has recently released the source code. Quote:
Use this thread please. |
||
18th December 2008, 02:36 | #2 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 111
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
20th December 2008, 17:44 | #3 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Internet
Posts: 378
|
Whats this AACS implementation supposed to do? You want to be able to retrieve the Volume ID and maybe other AACS related stuff too (maybe up to decrypted CPS Unit keys)? Or do you want to provide an interface that other applications can use to transparently access AACS protected media?
|
20th December 2008, 18:23 | #4 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 189
|
An interface for other applications to transparently access AACS encrypted media like libdvdcss2 for obsolete DVDs. A kernel module like AnyDVD-HD would be great but letting the content code run arbitrary code with TRAP_RunNative in kernel mode is not acceptable.
|
25th December 2008, 21:53 | #5 | Link |
clueless n00b
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 10,579
|
in light of a previous implementation (libaacs) does it really make sense to reinvent the wheel?
__________________
For the web's most comprehensive collection of DVD backup guides go to www.doom9.org |
29th December 2008, 02:14 | #6 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 111
|
Took a while, but with help I have obtained libaacs-0.05 sources, this could be the latest version, it is hard to know. The developer seems to have disappeared as well. It is possible we can just use libaacs directly, but without the authors input it may be a greater hassle than to re-organise it into a complete library with libbluray. It also contains FUSE, and kernel portions which should be shipped separately. (UDF2.50 support is beyond the scope, and OS dependent.)
|
21st September 2009, 08:12 | #10 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 45
|
Quote:
|
|
21st September 2009, 09:56 | #11 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 31
|
Ok - check the mplayer-dev-eng mailing list and take a look ath the discussion over the past two weeks.
Check out XYZ123's post at: http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=149392 I also know of another non-public (yet) project working on a similar lib. |
21st September 2009, 14:03 | #12 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 45
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
21st September 2009, 18:02 | #15 | Link |
ffx264/ffhevc author
Join Date: May 2007
Location: /dev/video0
Posts: 1,844
|
There's no reason to force people to provide you with information on bluray libs currently not public or "behind the scenes", especially since you're not a programmer and wouldn't know what to do with them in the first place. Also, he doesn't "know" the bluray project of mplayer as he's the dev of that project in the first place, not heard of it from someone else
Last edited by microchip8; 21st September 2009 at 18:07. |
22nd September 2009, 10:31 | #17 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 31
|
@GLUBSCH
Listen to froggy1 on this one. Some people in this community are working hard in bringing proper bluray support to linux. I don't have to justify anything and you can believe what you want. Have you ever thought that maybe some people don't wish their identities to be known and while they are working hard on this stuff they can't be bothered to get in trouble for it? So yes, that's what 'behind the scenes' means and I hope that when you benefit from their work one day, you'll be more appreciative. |
22nd September 2009, 10:50 | #18 | Link | |
ffx264/ffhevc author
Join Date: May 2007
Location: /dev/video0
Posts: 1,844
|
Quote:
Since he didn't provide you with info on all he knows and you wanted that info for whatever reason, you tried to provoke by saying that you don't believe him which is a tactic often used by people to passively force others to confirm their story/claims thus in the end giving you the proof/info they know which you also want to have There's no reason not to believe a dev, especially on this forum, as people don't lie around here and there's little reason to. We all work in the same field and common goal Anyways, back on topic Last edited by microchip8; 22nd September 2009 at 10:55. |
|
|
|