Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.


Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Capturing and Editing Video > Capturing Video

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 29th March 2011, 03:08   #1  |  Link
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2
Is deinterlacing, denoising and other processing really necessary before encoding?

I've been capturing video from a Video8 source to interlaced MBAFF H.264. I see some people process video before encoding but I haven't really seen advantages from that.

Deinterlacing to 29.97 fps progressive makes motion less fluid and is a compromise between blur and interlacing artifacts. I don't like the idea of permanently putting this degradation into the video. Deinterlacing to 59.94 fps progressive produces a better result but greatly inflates file size. Windows 7 plays interlaced H.264 pretty well, and ffdshow-tryouts with Yadif deinterlacing plays it extremely well.

Some people seem to focus a lot on denoising, but there again I don't see much point. Yes, I can see some slight noise, and it's quite noticeable when manually stepping from field to field. However, the x264 encoder seems to remove most of it. Denoising tends to ruin subtle noise-like textures, like distant grass, road asphalt and slightly dirty walls. At the same x264 CRF, there's a slight decrease in file size, but encoder artifacts become more visible when subtle textures are smoothed.

The only processing I'm doing is a bit of cropping to remove the blackness at the edges and the head switching at the very bottom.
dreamlayers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2011, 09:34   #2  |  Link
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 823
You are correct in that you only should keep filtering to the bare minimum of what you think is necessary. Not all people have the same preferences.
GodofaGap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2011, 13:25   #3  |  Link
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 5,393
Well, general recommendations like "you should always do [this]", or "you should never do [that]" are always dangerous. As silly as it may sound, but the only rule that's generally true is: "it depends".

Look at this example: video comparison (MediaFire, ~11 MB)

In this case it's an interlaced DVB capure. One time encoded as interlaced 25i MBAFF (x264 --crf 20 --preset fast --tff), one time encoded as bobbed 50p (x264 --crf 20 --preset fast).

Originally Posted by dreamlayers
Deinterlacing to 59.94 fps progressive [...] greatly inflates file size.
Bitrates of this example:

25i MBAFF: ~3332 kbps

50p bobbed: ~2945 kbps

Here, bobdeinterlacing to double framrate gives a smaller filesize compared to keeping it interlaced. Oops!

And now,
Originally Posted by dreamlayers
ffdshow-tryouts with Yadif deinterlacing plays it extremely well.
compare the visual result of Yadif-realtime-deinterlacing to the visual result of the bob-deinterlaced example. Does Yadif still look that good? Do I need to argue? (No I don't.)

You see, in this example most of you issues are put upside-down and inside-out ...

Okay, DVB and Video-8 are not exactly the same thing. But still, it's a valid case example, and should make obvious why "general recommendations" should generally be avoided.
- We´re at the beginning of the end of mankind´s childhood -

My little flickr gallery. (Yes indeed, I do have hobbies other than digital video!)
Didée is offline   Reply With Quote

deinterlacing, denoising, interlaced, video8, x264

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:56.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.