Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
12th September 2014, 12:56 | #21061 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 172
|
Quote:
I will encode Once Upon A Time In America later, to see what happens and will let you know. |
|
12th September 2014, 14:30 | #21062 | Link |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,973
|
You weren't, by chance, encoding a DVD import and resizing it, were you? I noticed something odd early today in TSMUXER that could (very rarely, I'd guess) cause it to detect a 480i/29.97 source as 480p/29.97 (it might also happen on 576i/25, but I haven't seen it). That caused an encode failure on a source I tried. Interestingly TSMUXER lists it at 480i -- but sets the MPLS as 480p/29.97 (which is illegal for a BD primary source). I've added a workaround that will be included in the next release of BD-RB.
Last edited by jdobbs; 12th September 2014 at 14:36. |
12th September 2014, 14:49 | #21063 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 172
|
Quote:
Source was BD, No Capre No Glory, as I mentioned earlier. Wait..wait..Holy Crap..Exactly where it started to get faster no more video is present, just audio and a black screen Source is 1080p destination is the same. Last edited by daberti; 12th September 2014 at 14:52. |
|
12th September 2014, 15:31 | #21065 | Link |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,973
|
A note for everyone:
I'm hoping to include an ALTERNATE output capability to HEVC (H.265) in the next release. It will work only to MKV. I think it will be a good alternative for creating high-quality backups of BD movies, while using significantly less space. In order to support it in the way I hope, you will need a Directshow filter that supports H.265. This link points to an installer for the libde265 directshow filter. I tested it (a little) and it will play back an H.265 MKV via Media Player Classic (found in the BD-RB TOOLS\MPC folder). More information on the project and the filter are available here and here. Last edited by jdobbs; 12th September 2014 at 16:54. |
12th September 2014, 17:04 | #21069 | Link |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,973
|
Thanks. I'm doing testing now using SSIM to try and determine the relationship between CRF values for each encoder (X264 & X265). There'll also have to be a conversion to H.264 if importing HEVC to make it compatible with BD (at least until they finalize H.265 support)... but I do that now with a DIVX or MPEG-4 sources, so it shouldn't be a big deal. I just have to do it as lossless as possible while keeping a reasonable interim size.
Last edited by jdobbs; 12th September 2014 at 17:07. |
12th September 2014, 17:07 | #21070 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,059
|
Quote:
Tsmuxer also handle hevc and output could be m2ts or others.
__________________
If you fail to plan; you plan to fail, would you not agree? Think about it. |
|
12th September 2014, 17:20 | #21072 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,059
|
Yes, it can. I recently ran test just for you.
__________________
If you fail to plan; you plan to fail, would you not agree? Think about it. Last edited by HWK; 12th September 2014 at 17:25. |
12th September 2014, 17:31 | #21073 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 172
|
Quote:
I'm doing ALTERNATE so Directshow should be used anyway. 1)without MULTIPROCESS 2)with multiprocess=1 Will tell you later. BTW: H265 in next release? you rule Edit: Without Multiprocess: same failure if 1080p. If i choose to resize to 720p there is no issue. Mmmmhh..I begin thinking something......so I'm changin a setting to verify my ideas. Edit Yes, I was right. JD, you told me that ALTERNATE switches on FFDshow for frame serving even if LAVF is On. Yet something is going wrong. If I resize to 720p LAVF is disabled and all goes good. If I use MULTIPROCESS LAVF is disabled at any HD resolution, ditto as above. If I leave LAVF on and I don't choose DirectShow Frame Serving (leaving LAVF on) the problem arise. Last edited by daberti; 12th September 2014 at 20:31. |
|
12th September 2014, 17:33 | #21074 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,059
|
Hail to Jdobbs , seriously this is great step forward. However don't get too confident I did few 1080P sources to H.265 and they take their sweet time.
__________________
If you fail to plan; you plan to fail, would you not agree? Think about it. |
12th September 2014, 18:51 | #21076 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,059
|
Which version of H.265 encoder did you use and what was your source clip?
I am using one located here http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=168814
__________________
If you fail to plan; you plan to fail, would you not agree? Think about it. Last edited by HWK; 12th September 2014 at 18:53. |
12th September 2014, 20:22 | #21077 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 172
|
Quote:
Source clip was the same I'm encoding these days: No Capre No Glory (BD) |
|
12th September 2014, 21:47 | #21078 | Link | |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,973
|
Quote:
|
|
13th September 2014, 02:03 | #21080 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,100
|
Quote:
As far as the speed of encoding goes, it is SO dang weird now. I have absolutely NO idea what changed, but now encodes (using LAVF like I always do) take like twice as long (12 hours instead of 6) I'm pretty sure everything is the same and it LOOKS like I am topping out my CPU while encoding too. Most odd... I even used version 4707 just as a momentary test comparison, just to start it and see how fast it was going, but it appeared to be about the same as the newer version. I can't for the life of me figure out WHAT has changed. Oh well, at least it is getting done, and I guess if I INSIST on using these x264 tweaks (the same ones I've always used on demanding encodes) I'm just gonna hafta live with it taking longer. I can tell immediately that the fps are a lot slower than they were before. I'll play around with it and see if I am indeed missing something. But, I AM glad that the program is working and doing an excellent job though! |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|