Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
17th November 2009, 20:21 | #62 | Link | |
Software Developer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Last House on Slunk Street
Posts: 13,248
|
Quote:
Download: http://download.macromedia.com/pub/l...gin_111709.exe
__________________
Go to https://standforukraine.com/ to find legitimate Ukrainian Charities 🇺🇦✊ |
|
17th November 2009, 20:43 | #65 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 849
|
Adobe release notes say something along the line of using hardware acceleration. So did Adobe fix anything, or did they just get DXVA to fix it for them (kinda like coreavc 1.9.5 also works flawlessly... if you use CUDA)? Either way, good to know it's fixed, somehow.
Less work for Atom, more work for ION my HTPC like, very much.
__________________
Geforce GTX 260 Windows 7, 64bit, Core i7 MPC-HC, Foobar2000 |
17th November 2009, 20:48 | #66 | Link | |
Software Developer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Last House on Slunk Street
Posts: 13,248
|
Quote:
But can't say for sure that DXVA isn't involved anyway. However I noticed that with "Enable Hardware Acceleration" the scaling quality is really bad. Looks like Point Resize.
__________________
Go to https://standforukraine.com/ to find legitimate Ukrainian Charities 🇺🇦✊ Last edited by LoRd_MuldeR; 17th November 2009 at 20:53. |
|
17th November 2009, 20:50 | #67 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 29
|
@lexor
If you can trust AnandTech then 10.1 uses DXVA (for the Hardware acceleration): http://anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3678&p=1 ATI users are still out of luck it seems, since the GPU-acceleration only works with HD4xxx cards (or HD3xxx IGP) and Catalyst 9.11 driver which isn't out yet. The Catalyst 9.11 beta driver doesn't work (tested this myself). |
17th November 2009, 20:52 | #68 | Link | |
x264 developer
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,666
|
Quote:
|
|
19th November 2009, 19:40 | #69 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,926
|
x264 0.72.1222 d0ee6f8
built on Aug 20 2009, gcc: 3.4.6 encoded 2419 frames, 11.20 fps, 2949.58 kb/s x264 0.79.1342 e8501ef built on Nov 16 2009, gcc: 3.4.6 encoded 2419 frames, 8.73 fps, 2951.58 kb/s Whats going on i triple checked this and it definitely got a lot slower @ crf, is really the weightp addition the cause of this slowdown ? im using this encoding settings x264.exe "%SourceVideo%" --crf 24 --preset veryfast --profile high --cabac -m 3 --no-deblock --weightp 2 --8x8dct -b 3 --aq-mode 2 --ssim --psnr --partitions i8x8,i4x4,p8x8 -o "%SourceVideo%.mp4" i also have to explicitly force --weightp 2 else only wpredb seems to be used but no wpredp here the analyse data i couldn't see any difference visually between the encodes but first realized this heavy slowdown (Ben Waggoners Dreamworks The Island Trailer) x264 [info]: i16 v,h,dc,p: 35% 26% 16% 23% x264 [info]: i8 v,h,dc,ddl,ddr,vr,hd,vl,hu: 15% 18% 28% 6% 6% 7% 7% 6% 7% x264 [info]: i4 v,h,dc,ddl,ddr,vr,hd,vl,hu: 19% 20% 12% 7% 9% 9% 9% 7% 8% x264 [info]: Weighted P-Frames: Y:8.4%
__________________
all my compares are riddles so please try to decipher them yourselves :) It is about Time Join the Revolution NOW before it is to Late ! http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=168004 Last edited by CruNcher; 19th November 2009 at 20:00. |
19th November 2009, 21:58 | #71 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,926
|
i guessed so, i also tried it now with --weightp 0 and no weightp @ all no big speed difference i gonna try now to see when this was introduced by checking all builds between 1222-1342, i missed a lot
PS: it seems the range of the performance drop is somewhere between 1240 (encoded 2419 frames, 9.73 fps, 2941.27 kb/s)-1280 (encoded 2419 frames, 8.92 fps, 2944.83 kb/s)
__________________
all my compares are riddles so please try to decipher them yourselves :) It is about Time Join the Revolution NOW before it is to Late ! http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=168004 Last edited by CruNcher; 19th November 2009 at 23:16. |
20th November 2009, 06:52 | #73 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,926
|
Sorry i was a bit to fast with my assumption the Windows cache blinded me, i should have known better that this was impossible
x264 0.72.1232 c8edc12 built on Aug 25 2009, gcc: 3.4.6 x264 [info]: SSIM Mean Y:0.9533577 x264 [info]: PSNR Mean Y:40.359 U:43.930 V:44.165 Avg:41.213 Global:40.136 kb/s: 2925.99 encoded 2419 frames, 9.82 fps, 2926.42 kb/s x264 0.79.1342 e8501ef built on Nov 16 2009, gcc: 3.4.6 [WEIGHTP 1] x264 [info]: SSIM Mean Y:0.9535975 x264 [info]: PSNR Mean Y:40.390 U:43.942 V:44.190 Avg:41.241 Global:40.179 kb/s: 2951.00 encoded 2419 frames, 8.85 fps, 2951.00 kb/s [WEIGHTP 2] x264 [info]: SSIM Mean Y:0.9536431 x264 [info]: PSNR Mean Y:40.377 U:43.927 V:44.175 Avg:41.229 Global:40.180 kb/s: 2951.58 encoded 2419 frames, 8.68 fps, 2951.58 kb/s looks much more real world
__________________
all my compares are riddles so please try to decipher them yourselves :) It is about Time Join the Revolution NOW before it is to Late ! http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=168004 Last edited by Guest; 20th November 2009 at 14:32. Reason: 4 |
Tags |
artifacts, coreavc, corruption, weightp |
|
|