Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
24th January 2020, 14:36 | #201 | Link |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,814
|
So everything is ok then. Activate 3rd server and see if cpu usage goes up.
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper |
25th January 2020, 07:54 | #202 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
I did have to fiddle aroud to get distributed encoding to work and while doing that I did not set the process priority correctly. After setting it to normal the usage is mostly 100%. thx |
|
8th February 2020, 14:33 | #203 | Link |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,814
|
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper |
8th February 2020, 16:36 | #204 | Link |
Big Bit Savings Now !
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: close to the wall
Posts: 1,545
|
Muuuhahahaa !
Still so much improvement above the 3970, unbelievable.
__________________
"To bypass shortcuts and find suffering...is called QUALity" (Die toten Augen von Friedrichshain) "Data reduction ? Yep, Sir. We're that issue working on. Synce invntoin uf lingöage..." |
8th February 2020, 18:23 | #205 | Link | |
Lost my old account :(
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 324
|
Quote:
If its not a saturation/thread utilization issue, i wonder were the bottlneck is? Cache/ram bandwith? Last edited by excellentswordfight; 8th February 2020 at 18:35. |
|
8th February 2020, 18:37 | #206 | Link |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,814
|
I suspect that 5 instances of x265 encoding 1080p at the same time might not be enough for constant 100% cpu usage. If you overclock 3990X to 3.7 GHz then you should get extra ~50% vs 3970x.
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper |
8th February 2020, 19:54 | #207 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Region 0
Posts: 1,436
|
Quote:
https://www.anandtech.com/show/15483...3990x-review/3 |
|
8th February 2020, 23:35 | #208 | Link |
Testeur de codecs
Join Date: May 2003
Location: France
Posts: 2,484
|
I think that 5 instance for x265 1080p encoding can't saturate 128 thread. Perhaps time for update at 8 instance or even more with this really particular CPU. Even 3970x with 64 thread seem have problem. In good multithreaded application like cinebench, you have 100% improvement between 3950x and 3970x.
__________________
Le Sagittaire ... ;-) 1- Ateme AVC or x264 2- VP7 or RV10 only for anime 3- XviD, DivX or WMV9 Last edited by Sagittaire; 8th February 2020 at 23:39. |
8th February 2020, 23:47 | #209 | Link | |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,814
|
Quote:
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper |
|
9th February 2020, 07:01 | #211 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 447
|
It could additionally be interesting to test it on normal non-enterprise Windows 10 but with SMT disabled.
__________________
____HTPC____ | __Desktop PC__
2.93GHz Xeon x3470 (4c/8t Nehalem) | 4.5GHz 1.24v dual-core Haswell G3258 Radeon HD5870 | Intel iGPU 2x2GB+2x1GB DDR3-1333 | 4x4GB DDR3-1600 |
9th February 2020, 09:26 | #212 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 2,901
|
Summary:
Someone with access to a 3990X reviewer/ tester could ask for benchmarks using: 1) Windows 10 Pro 2) Windows 10 Enterprise 3) Linux 4) SMT disabled
__________________
Win 10 x64 (19042.572) - Core i5-2400 - Radeon RX 470 (20.10.1) HEVC decoding benchmarks H.264 DXVA Benchmarks for all |
9th February 2020, 10:35 | #213 | Link | |||
Lost my old account :(
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 324
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
3990X is a very cool CPU, but tbh its not a good buy for a workstation CPU *. Look at the benchmarks, you get good performance scaling in very few applications, 3970X is faster in quite a few cases cause of higher clock speeds and the applications were the scaling is good like in cinebench, yeah I rather just get octane and 3x 2080Ti if I were an c4d user... * in general that is, iaf you have workloads were this makes sense for you, then yeah good for you. Last edited by excellentswordfight; 9th February 2020 at 13:15. |
|||
9th February 2020, 23:42 | #214 | Link | |
Big Bit Savings Now !
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: close to the wall
Posts: 1,545
|
Quote:
(Price blanked out by me of course.) I see the TR3990X base clock significantly limited to 2,9GHz for that reason... (TR3960X was 3,8GHz, TR3970X was still 3,7GHz) Well, maybe a bit unfair to compare multi-die CPUs against single-die CPUs anyway, but the race is on. For bigger dies the manufacturer loses the bet against failures more often. Yields of smaller dies seem more rewarding. The best bet seems to be after the race: to compile a CPU out of the smaller die survivers;-)
__________________
"To bypass shortcuts and find suffering...is called QUALity" (Die toten Augen von Friedrichshain) "Data reduction ? Yep, Sir. We're that issue working on. Synce invntoin uf lingöage..." Last edited by Emulgator; 9th February 2020 at 23:54. |
|
10th February 2020, 15:27 | #215 | Link | |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,814
|
Quote:
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper Last edited by Atak_Snajpera; 10th February 2020 at 16:01. |
|
24th February 2020, 16:09 | #216 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Region 0
Posts: 1,436
|
I was able to benchmark my new R9 3950X system against my E5-2687W v2 in x265 using the settings I've been playing around with for high image quality encodes. Both are running stock clocks.
x265 version: Code:
x265 [info]: HEVC encoder version 3.1.1+1-04b37fdfd2dc x265 [info]: build info [Windows][GCC 9.1.1][64 bit] 8bit+10bit+12bit x265 [info]: (libavcodec 58.53.101) x265 [info]: (libavformat 58.28.101) x265 [info]: (libavutil 56.30.100) x265 [info]: (lsmash 2.16.1) --pools 4 -F 1 --crf 16.0 -p veryslow --no-sao --aq-mode 1 --aq-strength 1.15 --vbv-maxrate 25000 --vbv-bufsize 25000 --level 5.0 --keyint 125 --open-gop -D 10 --colorprim "bt709" --transfer "bt709" --colormatrix "bt709" --sar 1:1 The source is a piece of a 1080i60 concert blu-ray that was restored to 1080p25 (1920x1080). I encoded the same 2500 frame segment multiple times and measured the time to encode. Four simultaneous encodes will effectively saturate the E5-2687W v2. It took an average time of 24001 seconds to encode the 2500 frames (four simultaneous encodes) on the E5-2687W v2. That gives a combined fps of the 4 simultaneous encodes of 0.417 fps. Four simultaneous encodes will hit 55-60% CPU on the R9 3950X. It took an average time of 7191 seconds to encode the 2500 frames (four simultaneous encodes) on the R9 3950X. That gives a combined fps of the 4 simultaneous encodes of 1.391 fps. Eight simultaneous encodes will effectively saturate the R9 3950X. It took an average time of 11302 seconds to encode the 2500 frames (eight simultaneous encodes) on the R9 3950X. That gives a combined fps of the 8 simultaneous encodes of 1.770 fps. As a point of reference x265_FHD_Benchmark said my R9 3950X is ~4x faster than the E5-2687W v2 (77.49 fps vs. 19.05 fps). TLDR / summary: E5-2687W v2 - 0.417 fps (4 simultaneous encodes combined) R9 3950X - 1.391 fps (4 simultaneous encodes combined) R9 3950X - 1.770 fps (8 simultaneous encodes combined) Last edited by Stereodude; 25th February 2020 at 05:16. Reason: fix typo |
15th March 2020, 00:25 | #217 | Link | ||
Programmer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 496
|
Quote:
Is this still neccessary as I think the Jan 15 update you added x570 drivers. Doing this on a Asrock Taichi x570. Do the USB ports work after installing from an ISO updated using you latest now? Seems there are modded drivers that will even allow for USB to work. Are these the ones you used? https://www.win-raid.com/t4960f52-So....html#msg99977 Also will this work with IDE SATA set to AHCI mode? This is going to be installed on a Samsung NVMe drive. Also any tips on a dual boot Win7 and Win10 As I notice that you mention to enable CSM on Motherboards to be able to install Win7, but this noticed this at AMD site. Is this true or is much of what they are saying negligible as well? Also not sure if Win7/10 can peacefully co-exist on an NVMe. As I keep reading that in order for Win10 install to see NVMe drive you need UEFI. Quote:
Last edited by jfcarbel; 15th March 2020 at 03:40. |
||
4th May 2020, 09:13 | #219 | Link | |
Lost my old account :(
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 324
|
Quote:
How fast will it be? How long is a piece of string? |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|