Help tritical's interpolation research by contributing CPU cycles - Page 2

tritical · 9th September 2007, 21:10

@Chainmax
Yep, that is correct.

@cwk
I did a more complete speed test. Results for bobbing the 657 frame clip I mentioned earlier:

Code:

1.6 Ghz Pentium M:
  EEDI2:        3.74 fps
  New Filter:   2.38 fps

Q6600 @ 2.8 Ghz:
  EEDI2:                    7.64 fps
  EEDI2 (mt):              18.77 fps   (multithreaded version by foxyshadis)
  New Filter (1 threads):   6.99 fps
  New Filter (2 threads):  13.27 fps
  New Filter (4 threads):  23.89 fps
  New Filter (8 threads):  23.46 fps

The quality is pretty good. On the 657 frame clip I used for speed testing, it achieves more than a 25% reduction in squared error compared to cubic interpolation. For reference, eedi2 achieves a 7.5% reduction, and all of the common ela methods (like those found in tdeint, tomsmocomp, yadif) are worse than cubic. This clip contains frames that should heavily favor an edge directed interpolater over cubic. However, there are some things it doesn't handle as well as it could. It should be relatively easy to improve its performance in those areas though.

EDIT: there was a little problem with the fps numbers the first time.

Chainmax · 10th September 2007, 23:04

Approaching the 29k mark...
Sorry for the slowness, but I can't leave it on 24h a day

.

tritical · 10th September 2007, 23:13

If you just want to upload it now, I can finish the last 20k on one of my computers in probably 5 hours. It is just doing further training on already completed problems atm.

Chainmax · 11th September 2007, 00:16

I'd like to see it reach at least the 40k mark before uploading it, but if doing it now will result in better data then I will upload it at once.

Chainmax · 12th September 2007, 00:11

Files have been uploaded.

Adub · 27th September 2007, 19:15

Is this still being done? Or has your research finished, Tritical?
I have a e6600 just sitting around, so I could set it up to run 24hrs a day, if you need it.

foxyshadis · 27th September 2007, 19:59

Still lots left. Check who has what to see.

squid_80 · 30th September 2007, 08:52

I grabbed 34, just to have a look see. It really manages to push the CPU - my Q6600 is sitting on 71 degrees right now, which has never happened before. Should I be worried?

Dark Shikari · 30th September 2007, 09:18

I've got 36.

burfadel · 30th September 2007, 09:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by squid_80

I grabbed 34, just to have a look see. It really manages to push the CPU - my Q6600 is sitting on 71 degrees right now, which has never happened before. Should I be worried?

Depends on what programme you use to view the CPU temps...

Dark Shikari · 30th September 2007, 09:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by burfadel

Depends on what programme you use to view the CPU temps...

71 C is pretty normal for a full-load Core 2 Quad to be honest. To get lower you need a seriously powerful air cooler or better. Four cores generate a hell of a lot of heat.

squid_80 · 30th September 2007, 09:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by burfadel

Depends on what programme you use to view the CPU temps...

The program that came with the motherboard and speedfan 4.32 both show the same values, so I'd assume they're correct.

EDIT: I'm assuming other people have run this on a Q6600 and can tell me if it's normal or not.

tritical · 30th September 2007, 10:30

I run it on 2 Q6600s overclocked to 2.8 and 3.0, but they aren't using the stock heatsink/fan so I'm not sure this info will help much. Both stay right around 55C for cores 0/1 and 50C for cores 2/3. That is according to core temp v0.95. They both have Thermalright Ultra 120A heatsinks with 120mm Scythe fans which move about 49 CFM.

Also, are you going to run 34 or just testing? ... I couldn't tell from your post.

squid_80 · 30th September 2007, 15:41

I'll run it completely. My Q6600 is a B0 stepping (engineering sample) so it's probably going to be hotter than the latest (G0?). It's got a Zalman CNPS7700 cooler (didn't come with a stock cooler), not overclocked, cores 0/1 are 80C and 2/3 are 71C. The only thing that worries me is that I think the bios is set to shutdown at 75C. Good thing the weather is still cold here.

squid_80 · 30th September 2007, 16:14

I took 35 too. May as well give the E6600 something to do.

Demi9OD · 3rd October 2007, 21:46

Coretemp reports my Q6600@3400mhz@1.375v 62/62/57/57 under load. Lapped U120 and Lapped Q6600.

superuser · 1st July 2008, 22:45

is help still needed. I can try to allocate some of my computing for this purpose. let me know.

regards

9th September 2007, 21:10	#21 \| Link
tritical Registered User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: MO, US Posts: 999	@Chainmax Yep, that is correct. @cwk I did a more complete speed test. Results for bobbing the 657 frame clip I mentioned earlier: Code: 1.6 Ghz Pentium M: EEDI2: 3.74 fps New Filter: 2.38 fps Q6600 @ 2.8 Ghz: EEDI2: 7.64 fps EEDI2 (mt): 18.77 fps (multithreaded version by foxyshadis) New Filter (1 threads): 6.99 fps New Filter (2 threads): 13.27 fps New Filter (4 threads): 23.89 fps New Filter (8 threads): 23.46 fps The quality is pretty good. On the 657 frame clip I used for speed testing, it achieves more than a 25% reduction in squared error compared to cubic interpolation. For reference, eedi2 achieves a 7.5% reduction, and all of the common ela methods (like those found in tdeint, tomsmocomp, yadif) are worse than cubic. This clip contains frames that should heavily favor an edge directed interpolater over cubic. However, there are some things it doesn't handle as well as it could. It should be relatively easy to improve its performance in those areas though. EDIT: there was a little problem with the fps numbers the first time. Last edited by tritical; 9th September 2007 at 22:26.

10th September 2007, 23:04	#22 \| Link
Chainmax Huh? Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Uruguay Posts: 3,103	Approaching the 29k mark... Sorry for the slowness, but I can't leave it on 24h a day . __________________ Read Decomb's readmes and tutorials, the IVTC tutorial and the capture guide in order to learn about combing and how to deal with it.

11th September 2007, 00:16	#24 \| Link
Chainmax Huh? Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Uruguay Posts: 3,103	I'd like to see it reach at least the 40k mark before uploading it, but if doing it now will result in better data then I will upload it at once. __________________ Read Decomb's readmes and tutorials, the IVTC tutorial and the capture guide in order to learn about combing and how to deal with it.

12th September 2007, 00:11	#25 \| Link
Chainmax Huh? Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Uruguay Posts: 3,103	Files have been uploaded. __________________ Read Decomb's readmes and tutorials, the IVTC tutorial and the capture guide in order to learn about combing and how to deal with it.

27th September 2007, 19:15	#26 \| Link
Adub Fighting spam with a fish Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 2,699	Is this still being done? Or has your research finished, Tritical? I have a e6600 just sitting around, so I could set it up to run 24hrs a day, if you need it. __________________ FAQs:Bond's AVC/H.264 FAQ Site:Adubvideo

10th September 2007, 23:13	#23 \| Link
tritical Registered User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: MO, US Posts: 999	If you just want to upload it now, I can finish the last 20k on one of my computers in probably 5 hours. It is just doing further training on already completed problems atm.

27th September 2007, 19:59	#27 \| Link
foxyshadis Angel of Night Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Tangled in the silks Posts: 9,559	Still lots left. Check who has what to see.

30th September 2007, 08:52	#28 \| Link
squid_80 Registered User Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Melbourne, AU Posts: 1,963	I grabbed 34, just to have a look see. It really manages to push the CPU - my Q6600 is sitting on 71 degrees right now, which has never happened before. Should I be worried?

30th September 2007, 09:18	#29 \| Link
Dark Shikari x264 developer Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 8,666	I've got 36.

30th September 2007, 10:30	#33 \| Link
tritical Registered User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: MO, US Posts: 999	I run it on 2 Q6600s overclocked to 2.8 and 3.0, but they aren't using the stock heatsink/fan so I'm not sure this info will help much. Both stay right around 55C for cores 0/1 and 50C for cores 2/3. That is according to core temp v0.95. They both have Thermalright Ultra 120A heatsinks with 120mm Scythe fans which move about 49 CFM. Also, are you going to run 34 or just testing? ... I couldn't tell from your post.

30th September 2007, 15:41	#34 \| Link
squid_80 Registered User Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Melbourne, AU Posts: 1,963	I'll run it completely. My Q6600 is a B0 stepping (engineering sample) so it's probably going to be hotter than the latest (G0?). It's got a Zalman CNPS7700 cooler (didn't come with a stock cooler), not overclocked, cores 0/1 are 80C and 2/3 are 71C. The only thing that worries me is that I think the bios is set to shutdown at 75C. Good thing the weather is still cold here.

30th September 2007, 16:14	#35 \| Link
squid_80 Registered User Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Melbourne, AU Posts: 1,963	I took 35 too. May as well give the E6600 something to do.

3rd October 2007, 21:46	#36 \| Link
Demi9OD Registered User Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 127	Coretemp reports my Q6600@3400mhz@1.375v 62/62/57/57 under load. Lapped U120 and Lapped Q6600.

1st July 2008, 22:45	#37 \| Link
superuser Registered User Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 84	is help still needed. I can try to allocate some of my computing for this purpose. let me know. regards