Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
19th May 2017, 09:36 | #43748 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 930
|
Hello!
I've been having hangs using potplayer, when I quickly open files after each other, fast enought so the playback doesn't have time to start. At last I thoroughly tested it and it apparently it depends on using madVR as a renderer. I reported it to the potplayer dev (with Potplayer and madVR configuration) and he claims it's a madVR bug. I of course can't tell whether he's right or not, but I thought I'd mention it here. |
19th May 2017, 12:32 | #43749 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 48
|
just want to ask does anyone have a problem opening madvr settings with windows 10?
its a new build with windows 10 updated to the latest patch, so im wondering if i need to install anything else to make madvr works. thanks |
19th May 2017, 12:52 | #43750 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 491
|
Quote:
Just be sure to make a note of all your settings before you run it, if you can get to them. Best bet is to run "madHcCtrl.exe editLocalSettingsDontWait" command from the madVR folder. Last edited by jkauff; 19th May 2017 at 13:00. |
|
19th May 2017, 13:28 | #43751 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 48
|
Quote:
i tried both that line and editLocalSettings but still the same. the apps is running in the task manager and need to be force closed, but the window settings still not appearing ----------------------------- just found this and found the problem with nahimic 2. now it appears. http://bugs.madshi.net/view.php?id=478 Last edited by takenori; 19th May 2017 at 14:03. Reason: solved |
|
19th May 2017, 20:32 | #43753 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 4,407
|
The 1080 is faster (and 2x the price). Polaris doesn't like NGU very much.
__________________
madVR options explained Last edited by Asmodian; 19th May 2017 at 20:35. |
19th May 2017, 22:47 | #43755 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 4,407
|
Much less than twice... though I am not sure as to the exact ratio. I haven't seen any good benchmarks, only anecdotes from this thread.
Edit: Oops, it is probably around twice as fast.
__________________
madVR options explained Last edited by Asmodian; 20th May 2017 at 20:50. |
20th May 2017, 03:57 | #43756 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,923
|
it's not easy to do. boost clocks are unstable other algorithm are using the GPU too.
a 1060 is about 3-5 times as fast using NGU as a 480. i wouldn't be shocked if a 480 is generally fast when NGU isn't used. Last edited by huhn; 20th May 2017 at 11:45. Reason: major typo |
20th May 2017, 12:54 | #43758 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,923
|
i had both cards what's your reason for the doubt?
just as a reference i can do NGU sharp very high normal chroma with my 1060 when scaling 1080p23 -> 2160p23. compare that. high is already a problem for the RX 480. there goes something terrible wrong when using NGU on polaris cards. my r9 270 was totally fine using NGU. |
20th May 2017, 14:59 | #43759 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 69
|
Quote:
My RX 470 can do NGU Sharp High and has a lot of headroom left. Test results below. 1080p23 -> 2160p23. All settings identical except for Luma: NGU Sharp Very High - 69.5ms (SM ON); 51ms (SM OFF) NGU Sharp High - 24.7ms (SM ON); 22.8ms (SM OFF) NGU Sharp Medium - 15.5ms (SM ON); 13.5ms (SM OFF) NNEDI3 256 - 89ms (SM ON); 83.2ms (SM OFF) NNEDI3 128 - 50.5ms (SM ON); 47.3ms (SM OFF) NNEDI3 64 - 31.6ms (SM ON); 29.6ms (SM OFF) I included smooth motion results because with NGU Very High performance hit was very hard for some reason, thought it was interesting. |
|
20th May 2017, 16:19 | #43760 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,923
|
sure https://abload.de/img/nguveryhigh2zcjho.png
way better result i'm used to. make me wonder if a driver update is the reason because my finding back in 2016 early 2017 where confirmed by other user and yours are not even close to it. i wonder why noone else is noticing such a giant permanence increase and reportet it. that's only about 1.5-2x. BTW. i was using SM back in the days. i saw stuff like 150 ms with my 480 back in the days (ngu was used on chroma doubling too). |
Tags |
direct compute, dithering, error diffusion, madvr, ngu, nnedi3, quality, renderer, scaling, uhd upscaling, upsampling |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|