Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
10th May 2016, 10:33 | #37841 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,650
|
The bug I've mentioned a couple of times about not being able in input more than one key press at a time on profiles under 'Devices'' still exists.
There is no hard and fast rule, evaluate the content and make the call yourself. |
10th May 2016, 10:47 | #37842 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 22
|
After some time reading about it, seems pretty complicated for me to devise the most optimal settings for the video output.
The only thing I have connected to the projector is the PC, nothing else. And the PC has a monitor too, which I use to work and watching movies. This is the whole chain of settings I have available to set. Would it be wise to configure RGB 0-255 in all the steps? Any downsides on that? If not, what would be the best setting? LAV Video (RGB): -TV (16-235) -PC (0-255) -Untouched madvr (RGB): -TV (16-235) -PC (0-255) Nvidia panel - Color format: -RGB -YCbCr442 -YCbCr444 Nvidia panel - Range: -TV (16-235) -PC (0-255) Projector: -TV (16-235) -PC (0-255) Monitor: -RGB -YPbPr Thank you guys, Best regards |
10th May 2016, 10:51 | #37843 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 919
|
Quote:
My question was a lot simpler, I just could not find where to turn it on till you replied. Found it: Processing-> Artifact Removal-> Reduce Ringing Artifacts. I'm of to try it.
__________________
System: i7 3770K, GTX660, Win7 64bit, Panasonic ST60, Dell U2410. |
|
10th May 2016, 10:58 | #37844 | Link | |||
Registered Developer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,140
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
10th May 2016, 11:17 | #37846 | Link | |
Registered Developer
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hamburg/Germany
Posts: 10,346
|
Quote:
If you can't judge the quality for yourself, then you might as well not bother, because you won't see a difference then either.
__________________
LAV Filters - open source ffmpeg based media splitter and decoders |
|
10th May 2016, 11:23 | #37847 | Link | |
X Cinema Projectionist NZ
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Auckland NZ
Posts: 310
|
Quote:
Im not the only one to report this now. I thought it was just me not able to apply the new anti-ring feature but others have mentioned it too. So that's good, its not just me doing something wrong.... |
|
10th May 2016, 11:58 | #37848 | Link | |||
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 187
|
Quote:
http://www.mediafire.com/view/pd8924...Comparison.png The application doesn’t resize so I am unable to show the complete table. But, I guess with the screenshots you will get a fair idea of the problem. Quote:
For testing, you may download the trial version of JPEG2000 Video Decoder. More information here. By default it outputs XYZ (disguised as RGB). You can enable the XYZ to RGB conversion through the decoder settings. It’s output is limited to 8 bits only. Honestly, the ideal solution would be that LAV outputs XYZ to madVR. Quote:
By the way, the file name tag “deringing=full|half” would enable/disable “reduce dark halos around bright edges, too” option, right? Last edited by omarank; 10th May 2016 at 12:31. |
|||
10th May 2016, 12:36 | #37849 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,650
|
Quote:
Revert to the previous version and unselect some options and then upgrade again, rinse and repeat as necessary. You hopefully should be able to find what's triggering it. The dehaloing is nice, but what are the chances of it being a little less soft/smudgy, I'd like to see it hopefully retain or "create" some kind of detail if possible. Can you add some grain and or allow the algo to be a little more flexible in it's choices of color? Last edited by ryrynz; 10th May 2016 at 12:43. |
|
10th May 2016, 13:54 | #37851 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,812
|
Quote:
However, ofc thanks a lot for the new build. |
|
10th May 2016, 15:46 | #37852 | Link | ||||||
Registered Developer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,140
|
Quote:
Do you have one madVR installation or multiple? Have you updated *all* the files on all PCs involved? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Really? In the American Dad example, I didn't really notice any noticeable leftovers. It looks very clean to me, and noticeably better than without deringing. Can you show an upscaled American Dad screenshot with/without deringing which shows that deringing makes it look weird? |
||||||
10th May 2016, 16:07 | #37853 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 22
|
I know, I have read those pages. But it has some cases where there was limitations I don't have. Like output devices that don't support extended ranges or dedicated HTPCs that don't care about messing up colors on desktop applications. There were shown quite some alternatives, each one with each drawbacks.
So that's why I am asking, I can assure you I have read them paying attention. Thank you for your input anyway :-) |
10th May 2016, 16:22 | #37854 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,812
|
Quote:
off: on (recommended setting for Anime): |
|
10th May 2016, 16:30 | #37855 | Link | |
Registered Developer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,140
|
Quote:
http://forum.doom9.org/showpost.php?...ostcount=37690 I won't say any more about it. Oh well, yes there are some leftovers... I still prefer the deringed image, but I suppose it's a matter of taste/preferences... |
|
10th May 2016, 16:32 | #37856 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,812
|
Quote:
Could it be that SuperRes doesn't compare the upscaled image with the source image which is already processed by deringing? |
|
10th May 2016, 16:43 | #37858 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 919
|
madshi, is there a way to ignore wrong ST.2086 metadata and use peak white was selected by user?
The official test video from Sony has completely useless metadata and madVR simply shows all white picture (0.5 nit peak white): * The video plays perfectly fine on a Samsung HDR TV as reported by users. It ignores the 2086 metadata completely, and just maps the bit values to luminance. http://demo-uhd3d.com/fiche.php?cat=uhd&id=144 Quote:
__________________
System: i7 3770K, GTX660, Win7 64bit, Panasonic ST60, Dell U2410. Last edited by James Freeman; 10th May 2016 at 17:07. |
|
10th May 2016, 16:45 | #37859 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,812
|
Quote:
Especially with super-xbr, the difference in the cartoon example without SuperRes is enormous. |
|
10th May 2016, 16:50 | #37860 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 139
|
Didn't Superres at 4 with AB introduce a bit of ringing anyway? Maybe try at superres 2 no AB or superres off to see if it's still bad. The sample aufkrawall posted seems noticeably worse than the one posted by madshi in his release post.
|
Tags |
direct compute, dithering, error diffusion, madvr, ngu, nnedi3, quality, renderer, scaling, uhd upscaling, upsampling |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|