Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > (HD) DVD, Blu-ray & (S)VCD > (HD) DVD & Blu-ray authoring

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 3rd September 2022, 16:11   #1281  |  Link
Hellboy.
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 53
I found a bug. When add a UHD, tsmuxer automatically check "Force BD-ROM V3 format". When remove everything in "input files" and add a 1080p bluray "Force BD-ROM V3 format" keep checked. And when add a 1080p bluray to create a Blu-ray folder, the 1080p bluray dont work. You need to uncheck "Force BD-ROM V3 format" when everything is remove in "input files".

This is using the playlists and Blu-ray folder.

Last edited by Hellboy.; 4th September 2022 at 03:01. Reason: explain better
Hellboy. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2022, 13:20   #1282  |  Link
a5180007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Marrakech, Morocco
Posts: 253
@Hellboy. please try tomorrow's release.
a5180007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th September 2022, 17:31   #1283  |  Link
Overrighter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 3
Hello, Everybody!
I hope my post will be somewhat useful, coz I couldn't find out an answer as to how to make Sony UBP-X800M2 trigger Dolby Vision (DV) input when playing an original m2ts file from the BD 4k DV disk using a USB flashdrive. Long story short. I run the m2ts file though tsMuxeR GUI git-2c58285 ("tsMuxeR 2022-08-14 Nightly Portable Windows 64-bit") from m2ts into the same m2ts only de-clicking unnecessary audio tracks and, Bingo!, x800m2 indicates Dolby Vision as input, while for the non-modified file it indicates just HDR. It was Uncharted 4k uhd disk. tsMuxeR shows two video tracks: 4k and 1080p for both original m2ts and after remuxing. If I could feedback anything more for the purpose of developing this wonderful utility, please ask. I'll do my best.
Overrighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th September 2022, 22:46   #1284  |  Link
Hellboy.
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 53
Is fixed. Thanks.

Question: What this mean? Is something bad?
H264 warn: SPS parameters is not consistent throughout a stream
Hellboy. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th September 2022, 18:58   #1285  |  Link
a5180007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Marrakech, Morocco
Posts: 253
@Hellboy. It is just a warning, sometimes a Sequence Parameter Set changes throughout the stream.
a5180007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2022, 10:56   #1286  |  Link
von Suppé
Registered User
 
von Suppé's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 640
TrueHD only with 3D ISO issue

I'm encountering issues when muxing TrueHD without embedded AC3 with elementary videostream(s) from imported 3DBD ISO.

Right from the start, tsMuxer is giving a lot of errors saying "TRUE-HD stream (track 3): bad frame detected at position... Resync stream."
Playback of resulting ISO gives major A/V sync issues. It makes no difference whether I choose to mux 3D (AVC + MVC) or 2D (AVC only).

Is this inherent to MVC-3D and supposed to be? When I mux TrueHD+AC3 track, things go without errors.
von Suppé is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd October 2022, 23:12   #1287  |  Link
Hart2hart
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 12
tsMuxer Open Source

What is the overall state of tsmuxer? It’s been a historically fabulous tool and I’m still using last good version from years ago which handles all contemporary audio formats but I believe drops a subtitle on occasion. It does video up to at leafy AVC H.264 maybe H.265 . I want to move on to 4k and hdr (DV, HDR10+).

Looks of work has been completed that is highly technical. Is it in good shape to handle this snd/or is there a list of known issues/limitations? More importantly is development / core developer(s) active?
Hart2hart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2022, 19:10   #1288  |  Link
Sakura-chan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 34
This is not really a bug, more of a question. I'm fairly new to tsmuxer.

Why do m2ts files remuxed with tsmuxer to the same format end up being smaller? For example, I grab a 5,820,604,416 bytes m2ts from a BD, containing an h264 and lpcm track (nothing complex). I remux it as is with tsmuxer to m2ts, nothing changed. I end up with a 5,806,061,568 bytes file. That's 14,542,848 bytes less than the original (13.87 MB).

Upon demuxing the tracks from both they are identical (compared checksums). So no issues, but why? I understand mkv having less overhead so the resulting remuxes will be smaller, but I expected staying in the same format would result in the same file sizes.
Sakura-chan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th November 2022, 16:20   #1289  |  Link
staina
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 67
What is that error "DTS-HD stream (track 3): bad frame detected at position02:45:07,402. Resync stream".

Why tsMuxer resync DTS-HD MA stream created in DTS HD Encoder Suite and completely DTS_HD MA stream will change? DTS HD Encoder Suite no detected bad frame.

Thank for answer
staina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th November 2022, 15:44   #1290  |  Link
Hart2hart
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hart2hart View Post
What is the overall state of tsmuxer? It’s been a historically fabulous tool and I’m still using last good version from years ago which handles all contemporary audio formats but I believe drops a subtitle on occasion. It does video up to at leafy AVC H.264 maybe H.265 . I want to move on to 4k and hdr (DV, HDR10+).

Looks of work has been completed that is highly technical. Is it in good shape to handle this snd/or is there a list of known issues/limitations? More importantly is development / core developer(s) active?

Guess my answer is in but it’s not what I had hoped it would be.
Hart2hart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2022, 00:00   #1291  |  Link
Emulgator
Big Bit Savings Now !
 
Emulgator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: close to the wall
Posts: 1,699
4..5 builds per month, see github repo. I would call this a very active development.
If you find a fault you may report it and upload files to reproduce the fault.
And it has been taken care of many, many times. 125 pages of actions since 2020-12
I couldn't ask for more and give big thank you's to a5180007, justdan96, xavery, jcdr408, and of course to the original developer.
__________________
"To bypass shortcuts and find suffering...is called QUALity" (Die toten Augen von Friedrichshain)
"Data reduction ? Yep, Sir. We're that issue working on. Synce invntoin uf lingöage..."
Emulgator is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2022, 00:29   #1292  |  Link
Emulgator
Big Bit Savings Now !
 
Emulgator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: close to the wall
Posts: 1,699
Quote:
Why do m2ts files remuxed with tsmuxer to the same format end up being smaller?
BD muxers (Scenarist, Sony, DoStudio) have provisions to accommodate all possible streams and their combinations
which are populated only if needed, but these PID positions will lead to more container overhead even if the stream is empty.
__________________
"To bypass shortcuts and find suffering...is called QUALity" (Die toten Augen von Friedrichshain)
"Data reduction ? Yep, Sir. We're that issue working on. Synce invntoin uf lingöage..."
Emulgator is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2022, 16:16   #1293  |  Link
Hart2hart
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 12
tsMuxer Open Source

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emulgator View Post
4..5 builds per month, see github repo. I would call this a very active development.
If you find a fault you may report it and upload files to reproduce the fault.
And it has been taken care of many, many times. 125 pages of actions since 2020-12
I couldn't ask for more and give big thank you's to a5180007, justdan96, xavery, jcdr408, and of course to the original developer.

Thanks. I didn’t think to look at GitHub. The developers were very active in forum when this started so I was expecting to see them here. Specifically, I was looking to understand if an “official” release was coming that would list what was included and any issues to avoid.

Many thanks for developers’ work.

Last edited by Hart2hart; 3rd December 2022 at 16:19.
Hart2hart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2023, 21:48   #1294  |  Link
a5180007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Marrakech, Morocco
Posts: 253
Question for tsMuxer users: do you want the insert SPS and SEI option to be the default or not ?
a5180007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2023, 14:33   #1295  |  Link
Hellboy.
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 53
What are the benefit of having "SPS and SEI".
Hellboy. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2023, 23:35   #1296  |  Link
Emulgator
Big Bit Savings Now !
 
Emulgator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: close to the wall
Posts: 1,699
If one chooses Blu-ray ISO or Blu-ray folder, yes, (wasn't it already ?),
(can not speak for other users that want to have .ts and .m2ts untouched, but yes, to me it would be welcome)
and while we are at it:
If Blu-ray ISO or Blu-ray folder, please add preload --start-time=524250, this is vital.

P.S. Ouch, I mistyped. 524280 !
__________________
"To bypass shortcuts and find suffering...is called QUALity" (Die toten Augen von Friedrichshain)
"Data reduction ? Yep, Sir. We're that issue working on. Synce invntoin uf lingöage..."

Last edited by Emulgator; 21st June 2023 at 00:15.
Emulgator is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2023, 10:50   #1297  |  Link
von Suppé
Registered User
 
von Suppé's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emulgator View Post
If Blu-ray ISO or Blu-ray folder, please add preload --start-time=524250, this is vital.
Sorry for this noob question, but could you please explain why the 524250 value is so vital? I've never really given this any thought and always left it as is. Never encountered problems with BD muxing - as far as I know.

Thanks in advance
von Suppé is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2023, 20:46   #1298  |  Link
Kuler087
Registered User
 
Kuler087's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Canada
Posts: 368
something is broken in the latest build... I have some file that have no video in mkvtoolnix.
the last working version is Nightly build from 2023-01-02-02-15-09

Kuler087 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2023, 05:10   #1299  |  Link
Emulgator
Big Bit Savings Now !
 
Emulgator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: close to the wall
Posts: 1,699
von Suppé:
Quote:
why the 524250 value is so vital?
https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.p...10#post1916110
and following...

P.S.
Again, I mistyped, sorry. 524580 !
__________________
"To bypass shortcuts and find suffering...is called QUALity" (Die toten Augen von Friedrichshain)
"Data reduction ? Yep, Sir. We're that issue working on. Synce invntoin uf lingöage..."

Last edited by Emulgator; 21st June 2023 at 00:16.
Emulgator is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2023, 10:40   #1300  |  Link
von Suppé
Registered User
 
von Suppé's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 640
@Emulgator: Thank you!
von Suppé is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:44.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.