Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2025
Posts: 3
|
4 Nostalgia Reason - How do I "create" authentic videos like it's 2001?
Hello,
I hope this is the right sub-forum for my questions/request. If not, feel free to move it to "General Discussion" or wherever it fits best. I have read the rules, so I hope I won't break any rules with my request and questions. Like the topic of the thread says, I want to "create" authentic videos as people did in 2001 (90s and early 00s). I was searching on the internet for programs and tools what people might have used and also came across some. That's also how I discovered this forum. I also checked out some of the programs on here (however some are not available anymore if I recall correct). I also saw the guides on this page. However checking their update date says 2005. And I want to use authentic programs and the authentic versions of these programs those that have been used at my mentioned timespan. The problem I have is that 2005 seems to be too late. I want the authentic version of the software and not just the right software but the latest version of it. So what have been the most common tools and programs that have been used back then in around 2001? I do not asked for on how everything need to be done and/or how things work. I more like want to know what tools, programs, codecs and software is needed. I know that you have needed more than only 1 program/tool back in the days. Like I said, I read the rules, I read the guides, I saw the links to all kind of software. But which of them exactly were used and more importantly in which combination? I mean there is sometimes more than 1 tool for the same purpose. If someone that have been around during that time, or anyone else with knowledge might make a list like: Quote:
Or something like that. I hope you got my point. (Also, not only the program but also what version of it.)That said, by "creating" I mostly refers to "Avi" and "MPEG", while the guides seem to only cover "Avi" (DivX). I'm not just referring to "Avi" and "MPEG", but it's mostly them. Others would be ".asf" and ".rm" but like I said for now it's mostly "Avi" and "MPEG". Someone else in the past who did something for me, used these. But I don't know how he did it.
My comman sense told me that "DIV3" might be "DivX3", "DX50" = "DivX5" and "MP43" = "MPEG4 v3" (similar to "DivX3"). While a research confirmed this to me and also told me that "DX50"/"DivX5" was from 2005, which wouldn't fit in my requested timeline somehow. Also an might important information. As source for this operation I'll use my DVDs. I hope you get my point for asking. Thanks. ![]() ![]() Last edited by Seth; 4th April 2025 at 03:09. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: South Africa
Posts: 319
|
If 2001 is the period, I would say that the tools were Alberto Vigata's FlasKMPEG and Avery Lee's VirtualDub. Also, TMPGEnc. The codecs were DivX 3.11 Alpha, which was a hack of Microsoft MPEG-4 ASP v3, and LAME for MP3. For decrypting the DVDs, there was a command-line tool, I think decss.
If I remember correctly, DivX 4 started development in 2001. It began with the "Project Mayo" codebase, but there was some dispute, and DivX became the proprietary descendant, whereas Xvid the open-source one. For my part, when I started encoding in 2004–5 as a teenager, inspired to encode The Lord of the Rings, I used DVD Decrypter, FlasKMPEG and later XMPEG, Azid, VirtualDub, DivX 5.21, and LAME ACM. I remember what a breakthrough it was, with The Two Towers, discovering the secret of two-pass encoding; and over the course of 2004, my last year of school, getting better and better tools; for example, Azid and LAME. Those were exciting times! Last edited by GeoffreyA; 4th April 2025 at 21:42. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | Link |
Big Bit Savings Now !
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: close to the wall
Posts: 1,906
|
You may choose your reference videos and throw them on mediainfo.
This will tell you about container, codec, resolution, bitrate, anything. Then you would start searching for the necessary software and apply the settings you just found. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_coding_format https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_codecs https://api.video/blog/video-trends/...tarts-in-1929/
__________________
"To bypass shortcuts and find suffering...is called QUALity" (Die toten Augen von Friedrichshain) "Data reduction ? Yep, Sir. We're that issue working on. Synce invntoin uf lingöage..." Last edited by Emulgator; 4th April 2025 at 22:34. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2025
Posts: 3
|
![]() Quote:
I already came across the combination of FlasKMPEG and VirtualDub. But this was dated 2004 and I wasn't sure if there was maybe something else before them. But it seems that I was already on the right way. I also took a peek at FlasKMPEG. But it seems that out of the box and without additional software and codecs it's not the best choice. I also heard of TMPGEnc, however the download link on this site was down and I forgot what problem I had with this one. Either it was because I couldn't find an old version of my said timespan (from a legit source) or maybe because the up-to-date version mentions "30 days limit". As for DivX codec, 3.11 Alpha would also been my choice. I know that it was a Microsoft MPEG-4 hack, but I didn't know it was ASP v3. Something I just wonder and forgot in my first post. But maybe this doesn't even make a difference in the result of the videos. What was the most common OS that people used? Windows 9x because of its widespread, and best support? Or maybe Windows 2000 because it could natively handle large files? Or maybe even something else? Also, I still have an old machine, would it make a difference in the result of the videos to use it, or is there no difference aside from the speed? Does anyone else have something to contribute or are the things GeoffreyA listed Quote:
Last edited by Seth; 5th April 2025 at 11:12. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: South Africa
Posts: 319
|
You're welcome. Of course, I'm speaking from memory, and only started around 2004, so my dates might be off. I had an idea that FlasKMPEG was before 2004, but perhaps that's wrong. I remember in the DivX 3.11 readme that they were recommending FlasKMPEG at the time. It's not the best tool, but did work. The later XMPEG fork by a French student, whose name I forget, improved it but was buggy.
There was also DVD2AVI, a popular tool that I didn't use; and one can't omit the "harder" route of frame-serving, AviSynth, but again, I can't speak about dates or anything there. Other tools that now come to mind are GordianKnot, Avidemux, as well as BeSweet, Headac3he, and ac3dec on the audio side of things. I don't know if they were around in 2001. Regarding the OS, I would imagine that 9x was popularly used. Windows 2000 was common on business computers; the disastrous Me was gaining a small bit of consumer share that year; and XP was coming out. If you've got an old machine, the difference will be speed. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Biddeford, Me USA
Posts: 168
|
I started encoding my ty captures right around that time. VirtualDub and Xvid were my goto tools. Avisynth was also part of my toolkit. I didn't start decrypting until much later, so I'm not really familiar with FlaskMpeg or Azid, though I do remember them being discussed here. My OS was Win 98, updating to 2K not long after.
Last edited by kempodragon; 5th April 2025 at 14:26. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 26
|
http://www.doom9.org/Old_news/old_news.htm
> [and navigate through the months] https://www.doom9.org/Old_news/march.html https://www.doom9.org/Old_news/jan01.htm https://www.doom9.org/Old_news/jan02.htm https://www.doom9.org/Old_news/jan03.htm https://www.doom9.org/Old_news/january04.htm https://www.doom9.org/Old_news/january05.htm https://www.doom9.org/Old_news/january06.htm https://www.doom9.org/Old_news/january07.htm https://www.doom9.org/Old_news/january08.htm https://www.doom9.org/Old_news/january09.htm |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2025
Posts: 3
|
Thanks you two, I'll take your additional informations in consideration.
I don't know and I don't remember if I saw them the first time when I was browsing the website. I probably did for sure. But since there were, for the same tasks, more than one program/tool I decided to asked. But I'll also take these in consideration. Thanks to you too. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,113
|
Does it absolutely, positively need to be 2001 or earlier? Because you have access to a LOT more good stuff, including possibly the first stable release (?) of AVIsynth, if you go up to 2002. Anyway...
Windows XP Smartripper 2.41 DVD2AVI 1.77.3 Adobe Premiere 6.0 Maybe AVIsynth 1.0 beta 7d or some fucking bullshit, I don't know, I can't find reliable release dates for any version prior to 2.0 (released 2002-07-03 according to Sourceforge) For making AVI files -> Virtualdub 1.4.8 or earlier (version 1.4.9 was released in 2002), DivX 4.12 or earlier (5.0 was released in 2002), and LAME mp3 For making MPG files -> Tsunami MPEG Encoder, also known as TMPEGEnc For making WMV files -> Windows Media Encoder 8 (WME 9 was released in 2002) For making RM files -> RealProducer 8.5 (RealProducer 9.0 came out in, you guessed it, 2002) For making ASF files -> I honestly have no idea where the fuck these came from For making Quicktime files -> LOL get a Mac Alternatively, if you hate yourself and your computer, and you want other people to hate themselves and their computers too, use Angelpotion instead of DivX. (note: that was a joke. Do NOT use Angelpotion)
__________________
I ask unusual questions but always give proper thanks to those who give correct and useful answers. Last edited by Katie Boundary; 17th April 2025 at 03:05. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: South Africa
Posts: 319
|
Quote:
As for Angelpotion, I remember it. Regarding LAME, luckily, 2001 was the year it hit critical mass of quality with 3.8x. Last edited by GeoffreyA; 17th April 2025 at 06:54. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 872
|
Quote:
AVI is one of the first video containers added to amateur cameras from the early 90s (size 320x240). In an era without the Internet and access to cameras, at least in Poland. MPEG is associated with DVD movies. Today, it is very poor quality, sometimes interlaced, lacks detail and colors. Associated with the h263 codec. Its equivalent was the pirated Xvid, which was much better than DVD. Then x264 appeared and there was an interesting piracy conspiracy. Although it was a better codec, everyone still copied or stole video to xvid. What about divx? First a pirate, then a paid codec. Not very popular, even a troublesome codec. Which website enjoyed great popularity over the years? https://codec.kyiv.ua/ I don't have to explain why, and programs like virtualdub and screen capture. I'll just add that today, TV documentaries from the 90s are unwatchable. I call it ORWO quality, i.e. orange colors. What more can be said. Fierce fight of editors with pirated avi audio ac3 codecs. Today there are no ac4 codecs available. Nobody uses avi x265. The cfhd codec has also become technologically backward. New codecs with better compression such as htjpeg2000, jpegxs and others have entered. Last edited by Jamaika; 18th April 2025 at 07:39. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | Link | |
Big Bit Savings Now !
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: close to the wall
Posts: 1,906
|
Here is an ubiquitous one: VP6 + MP3 in Flash
Code:
General Complete name : R:\Dok_u_Set_Usuario\Configurações locais\Temporary Internet Files\Content.IE5\0DYJ8XEF\174115[1].flv Format : Flash Video File size : 11.8 MiB Duration : 3 min 25 s Overall bit rate : 484 kb/s Frame rate : 20.000 FPS Tagging application : FlixEngineWindows_8.0.12.0 (www.on2.com) Video Format : VP6 Codec ID : 4 Duration : 3 min 24 s Bit rate : 404 kb/s Width : 208 pixels Height : 160 pixels Display aspect ratio : 4:3 Frame rate mode : Constant Frame rate : 20.000 FPS Bit depth : 8 bits Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.607 Stream size : 10.1 MiB (85%) Audio Format : MPEG Audio Format version : Version 2 Format profile : Layer 3 Format settings : Joint stereo / MS Stereo Codec ID : 2 Codec ID/Hint : MP3 Duration : 3 min 25 s Bit rate mode : Constant Bit rate : 64.0 kb/s Channel(s) : 2 channels Sampling rate : 22.05 kHz Compression mode : Lossy Stream size : 1.57 MiB (13%) Writing library : LAME3.96.1 ReportBy : MediaInfoLib - v24.11.1 CreatedOn : UTC 2025-04-18 10:24:40 http://www.on2.com/ Quote:
Code:
General Complete name : R:\_Testfiles\antialiasingtest.flv Format : Flash Video File size : 25.6 MiB Duration : 5 min 8 s Overall bit rate : 696 kb/s Frame rate : 30.000 FPS Tagged date : 2010-09-08 17:33:30 UTC Tagging application : inlet media FLVTool2 v1.0.6 - http://www.inlet-media.de/flvtool2 Video Format : Sorenson Spark Codec ID : 2 Duration : 5 min 8 s Bit rate : 512 kb/s Width : 448 pixels Height : 336 pixels Display aspect ratio : 4:3 Frame rate mode : Constant Frame rate : 30.000 FPS Bit depth : 8 bits Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.113 Stream size : 18.9 MiB (74%) Audio Format : ADPCM Format settings : ShockWave Codec ID : 1 Duration : 5 min 8 s Bit rate : 177 kb/s Channel(s) : 2 channels Sampling rate : 22.05 kHz Bit depth : 16 bits Stream size : 6.59 MiB (26%) ReportBy : MediaInfoLib - v24.11.1 CreatedOn : UTC 2025-04-18 10:35:40 Code:
General Complete name : R:\_Testfiles\sbs2000.RM Format : RealMedia File size : 1.93 MiB Duration : 35 s 665 ms Overall bit rate : 150 kb/s Frame rate : 15.000 FPS Movie name : "Side-by-side 2000" Performer : Various Copyright : ©2000 Conversion Only: www.nosferatu.com Video ID : 8 Format : RealVideo 2 Codec ID : RV20 Codec ID/Info : Based on H.263, Real Player 6 Duration : 34 s 266 ms Bit rate : 118 kb/s Width : 320 pixels Height : 240 pixels Display aspect ratio : 4:3 Frame rate : 15.000 FPS Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.102 Stream size : 493 KiB (25%) Audio ID : 6 Format : Cooker Codec ID : cook Codec ID/Info : Based on G.722.1, Real Player 6 Duration : 35 s 665 ms Bit rate : 32.1 kb/s Channel(s) : 1 channel Sampling rate : 22.05 kHz Bit depth : 16 bits Stream size : 140 KiB (7%) ReportBy : MediaInfoLib - v24.11.1 CreatedOn : UTC 2025-04-18 10:41:04
__________________
"To bypass shortcuts and find suffering...is called QUALity" (Die toten Augen von Friedrichshain) "Data reduction ? Yep, Sir. We're that issue working on. Synce invntoin uf lingöage..." Last edited by Emulgator; 18th April 2025 at 11:44. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | Link | |||
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,113
|
No, .wmv and .wma are the container formats of WMV/WMA
Quote:
(2) Mpeg-1 and Mpeg-2 do NOT lack detail or color. They can lose detail if you set the bitrate too low, but that is true of any codec. There are no codecs that lose color as the bitrate decreases. Quote:
Quote:
Flash was always niche, used by extremely few people and websites. Youtube used it in their very early days back when they compressed everything to 240p, and there was Newgrounds, and stickdeath.com, and that one website that was the source of the "I'M CHARGIN MUH LASER" meme, but it wasn't like anyone was distributing pirated movies as .flv or .swf files.
__________________
I ask unusual questions but always give proper thanks to those who give correct and useful answers. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
avi, create, mpeg, mpg, video |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|