Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
![]() |
#101 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 484
|
Thanx for mentioning, good news
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#103 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 1
|
Has anyone found the super resolution of BasicVSR++ to cause strange effects on certain video?
Before: ![]() After: ![]() It doesn't matter which I use, REDS, Vimeo-90K (BI), Vimeo-90K (BD), or even the NTIRE 2021 Video Super-Resolution, it creates harsh lines and distortions on this part of the video, and oddly only this part. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#106 | Link | |||||||
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 36
|
The order in which I installed BasicVSR++:
1、I have installed:Anaconda3-2022.10-Windows-x86_64、cuda_11.6.0_511.23_windows、python-3.10.8-amd64、VapourSynth64-R59 2、PyTorch: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
5、pip install --upgrade vsbasicvsrpp Quote:
![]() Last edited by gmail123; 26th December 2022 at 12:37. |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#109 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,626
|
Anyone try RealBasicVSR yet? It seems to produce oversmooth ,blurry, reduced detail results .
VRT SR is temporal and slightly higher metrics than basicvsr++ in the papers . In my short tests, it produces similar results to basicvsr++, but significantly slower than basicvsr++ . The provided pretrained models were trained on similar sets, and you get similar artifacts under similar conditions There is a new one RVRT, but I can't get it to run |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#110 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 7,700
|
Haven't tried RealBasicVSR, will look at it once it can be used through Vapoursynth.
btw. I just saw https://github.com/HolyWu/vs-femasr (https://github.com/chaofengc/FeMaSR), but haven't played around with it so far. ![]() Cu Selur |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#113 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 7,700
|
Did a quick test of vs-femasr and in general the results seem nice, but atm. it does create some strange highlights.
![]() Also TensorRT support does not work fo rme: https://github.com/HolyWu/vs-femasr/issues/2 Suzi: ![]() Cu Selur Last edited by Selur; 28th December 2022 at 15:46. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#114 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 7,700
|
https://github.com/raywzy/Bringing-O...s-Back-to-Life looks interesting.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#115 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
Can you explain what software and operating environment has been installed? Thank you very much! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#116 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 7,700
|
I don't really get the question. But maybe reading [INFO] Portable Vapoursynth (Windows) with pytorch&co helps, those are the steps I used back then to set up my portable Vapoursynth.
I can also send you a link (via pm) to a download of my latest portable Vapoursynth that I use in Hybrid, if that would help. Cu Selur |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#117 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#118 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 36
|
@Selur Special thanks to you! I have successfully installed vs-basicvsrpp.
Test video resolution: 2064*1416, 3070, 0.84 fps ![]() script: from vsbasicvsrpp import BasicVSRPP ret = core.resize.Bicubic(ret, format=vs.RGBS, matrix_in_s="470bg", range_s="limited") ret = BasicVSRPP(ret,model=3,fp16=True,tile_x=360,tile_y=480) ret = core.resize.Bicubic(ret, format=vs.YUV420P12, matrix_s="470bg", range_s="limited") Can it be optimized? ![]() Last edited by gmail123; 7th January 2023 at 11:31. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|